Đặc điểm tính cách của người đầu tuổi trưởng thành sử dụng ứng dụng hẹn hò tại Việt Nam

Đặc điểm tính cách của người đầu tuổi trưởng thành sử dụng ứng dụng hẹn hò tại Việt Nam

Các tác giả

  • Trần Thị Tùng Lâm Tác giả
  • Nguyễn Văn Lượt Tác giả

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1243/j5y08774

Từ khóa:

Tính cách, Ứng dụng hẹn hò, Người đầu tuổi trưởng thành

Tóm tắt

Nghiên cứu này được thực hiện với 296 khách thể người Việt Nam trong độ tuổi từ 18-24, đang sử dụng ứng dụng hẹn hò. Nghiên cứu sử dụng phiên bản Thang đo Năm yếu tố tính cách Big Five Inventory - Short Version - BFI-S). Kết quả nghiên cứu cho thấy tính dễ chịu có điểm trung bình cao nhất, trong khi tính hướng ngoại có điểm số thấp nhất. Nghiên cứu cũng chỉ ra sự khác biệt có ý nghĩa thống kê giữa nam và nữ về tính cách nhiễu tâm, trong đó nữ giới có điểm trung bình cao hơn nam giới. Nghiên cứu này góp phần cung cấp những hiểu biết về đặc điểm tính cách người dùng ứng dụng hẹn hò tại Việt Nam, mở rộng nghiên cứu về giao tiếp trong môi trường số, cũng như góp phần phát triển mô hình tính cách Big Five trong bối cảnh Việt Nam có liên quan đến sự tương tác xã hội trong không gian trực tuyến.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Albury, K., Burgess, J., Light, B., et al. (2017). Data cultures of mobile dating and hook-up apps: Emerging issues for critical social science research. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 1-11.

Anderson, M., Vogel, E. et al. (2020) “The virtues and downsides of online dating”. Pew Research Centre.

Ando, K., Giorgianni, F. E., Danthinne, E. S., et al. (2021). Beauty ideals, social media, and body positivity: A qualitative investigation of influences on body image among young women in Japan. Body Image, 38, 358-369.

Ansari, A. & Klinenberg, E. (2015). Modern Romance. New York: Penguin Press.

Beymer, M. R., Weiss, R. E., et al. (2014). Sex on demand: Geosocial networking phone apps and risk of sexually transmitted infections among a cross-sectional sample of men who have sex with men in Los Angeles County. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 90(7), 567-572.

Cai J. (2023). The spread of female body anxiety and appearance anxiety in modern social media, Communications in Humanities Research, 21(1), 53-59.

Caprara, G. V., Alessandri, G., et al. (2010). The contribution of agreeableness and self-efficacy beliefs to prosociality. European Journal of Personality, 24, 36-55.

Castro, A., & Barrada, J. R. (2020). Dating apps and their sociodemographic and psychosocial correlates: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24).

Coduto, K. D., Lee-Won, et al. (2020). Swiping for trouble: Problematic dating application use among psychosocially distraught individuals and the paths to negative outcomes, Journal of social and personal relationships, 37(1), 212-232.

Corey, P. & Chen, C. (2019). Young women’s experiences of parental pressure in the context of their career exploration. Australian Journal of Career Development, 28(2), 151-163.

Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., et al. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: Intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 247-253.

Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1987). Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-report and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 853-863.

Cummings, J. J., & Mays, K. (2021). Trait motivational reactivity as a predictor of online dating app behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, Article 106775.

Chambers, D. (2021). Dating apps logic and geoenabled mobile socialities. In: Hill A, Hartmann M and Andersson M. (eds). The Routledge Handbook of Mobile Socialities. Abingdon: Routledge, 101-114.

Decision Lab. (2022). Dating apps in Vietnam: A Valentine’s Day special report (p. 1-12). Hanoi.

Erevik, E. K., Kristensen, J. H., et al.(2020). Tinder use and romantic relationship formations: A large-scale longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1-10.

Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W. et al.(2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 3-66.

Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency in the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 329-344.

Fleeson, W., & Gallagher, P. (2009). The implications of Big-Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1097-1114.

Fowler, S. A., & Both, L. E. (2020). The role of personality and risk-taking on Tinder use. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), 1-7.

Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the big five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.

Gui, T. (2023). Coping with parental pressure to get married: Perspectives from Chinese “leftover women”. Journal of Family Issues, 44(8), 2118-2137.

Gibbs J, Ellison N & Lai C. (2011). First comes love, then comes Google: An investigation of uncertainty reduction strategies and self-disclosure in online dating. Communication Research, 38(1), 70-100.

Hodgson, N. (2017). The curious history of dating. Robinson.

Hogan, R. T., & Hogan, J. (1992). Hogan Personality Inventory manual. Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.

Holloway, I. W., Pulsipher, C. A., et al. (2015). Network influences on the sexual risk behaviors of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men using geosocial networking applications. AIDS and Behavior, 19, 112-122.

Holtzhausen N., et al. (2020). Swipe-based dating applications use and its association with mental health outcomes: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychology, 8, 1-12.

Lever, J., Grov, C., Royce, T., et al. (2008). Searching for love in all the “Write” places: Exploring Internet personals use by sexual orientation, gender, and age. International Journal of Sexual Health, 20(4), 233-246.

Lupton, D. (2020). “Not the real me”: Social imaginaries of personal data profiling. Cultural Sociology, 15, 3-21.

Lutz, C. & Ranzini, G. (2017). Where dating meets data: Investigating social and institutional privacy concerns on Tinder. Social Media and Society, 3, 1-12.

Mafishizas, M. (2023). Job Burnout in Women and the Need to Use Psychological Services and Counselling in Workplaces. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 36(5), 44-54.

Malone, G. P., Pillow, D. R., et al. (2012). The general belongingness scale (GBS): Assessing achieved belongingness. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 311-316.

Nieborg, D.B. & Poell, T. (2018). The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4275-4292.

Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2012). Emotion Regulation and Psychopathology: The Role of Gender. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 161-187.

Orchard, T. (2019). Dating apps. In Encyclopedia of Sexuality and Gender, 1-3.

Orosz, G., Benyó, M., Berkes, B., et al. (2018). The personality, motivational, and need-based background of problematic Tinder use. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(2), 301-316.

Perloff, R. M. (2014). Social media effects on young women’s body image concerns: Theoretical perspectives and an agenda for research. Sex roles, 71(11), 363-377.

Pronk, T. M., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2020). A Rejection Mind-Set: Choice Overload in Online Dating. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(3), 388-396.

Roisman G. I., Masten A. S., et al. (2004). Salient and emerging developmental tasks in the transition to adulthood. Child Development, 75, 123-133.

Rosean, L., Matić, J., et al. (2023). The propensity for dating apps usage and the millennials’ interpersonal skills development. Medijska istraživanja: znanstveno-stručni časopis za novinarstvo i medije, 29(2), 95-114.

Rosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the Internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 523-547.

Sharp, E. A., & Ganong, L. (2011). “I’m a loser, I’m not married, let’s just all look at me”: Ever-single women’s perceptions of their social environment. Journal of Family Issues, 32(7), 956-980.

Sprecher, S. & Felmlee, D. (2021). Social Network Pressure on Women and Men to Enter a Romantic Relationship and Fear of Being Single, Interpersona, 15(2), 246-261.

Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform Capitalism. London: Wiley & Sons.

Swickert, R. J., Hittner, J. B., et al. (2002). Relationships among Internet use, personality, and social support. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(4), 437-451.

Tackett, J. L., Kushner, S. C., et al. (2013). Delineating personality traits in childhood and adolescence: Associations across measures, temperament, and behavioral problems. Assessment, 20, 738-751.

Timmermans, E., & De Caluwé, E. (2017). To Tinder or not to Tinder, that’s the question: An individual differences perspective to Tinder use and motives. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 74-79.

Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2013). Self-Affirmation Underlies Facebook Use. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(3), 321-331.

Thomas, M., Binder, A., et al. (2023). The psychological influence of dating app matches: The more matches the merrier?. New Media & Society, 1-25.

Trương Thị Khánh Hà, Trần Hà Thu. (2017). Sử dụng thang đo tính cách năm nhân tố rút gọn (BFI - S) trên nhóm khách thể người Việt Nam. Tạp chí Tâm lý học, 10, 69 - 79.

Van Dijck J, Poell T., et al. (2018). The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Widiger, T. A. (2009). Neuroticism. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 129-146). The Guilford Press.

Lượt tải xuống

Đã Xuất bản

2026-06-29

Các bài báo được đọc nhiều nhất của cùng tác giả

Các bài báo tương tự

1-10 trên 127

Bạn cũng có thể bắt đầu một tìm kiếm tương tự nâng cao cho bài báo này.