Vai trò của các nguồn lực tâm lý cá nhân trong dự báo một số vấn đề sức khỏe tâm thần của thanh niên thế hệ Z
Vai trò của các nguồn lực tâm lý cá nhân trong dự báo một số vấn đề sức khỏe tâm thần của thanh niên thế hệ Z
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1243/44qdjg29Từ khóa:
Nguồn lực tâm lý cá nhân, Sức khỏe tâm thần, Thế hệ Z, Nghiện điện thoại, Cô đơn, Hài lòng cuộc sốngTóm tắt
Trong bối cảnh thế hệ Z phải đối diện với nhiều thách thức tâm lý - xã hội, nghiên cứu này kiểm định tác động của sáu nguồn lực tâm lý cá nhân (khả năng phục hồi, hy vọng, tự tin vào giá trị bản thân, tự chủ, lạc quan và sự chấp nhận) đối với ba khía cạnh sức khỏe tâm thần gồm hài lòng với cuộc sống, lạm dụng điện thoại và cảm giác cô đơn. Dữ liệu thu thập từ 689 thanh niên và phân tích hồi quy đa biến cho thấy sự chấp nhận nổi bật như yếu tố bảo vệ nhất quán, liên quan tích cực đến hài lòng cuộc sống và tiêu cực đến lạm dụng điện thoại cũng như cô đơn ở cả hai giới. Những phát hiện này nhấn mạnh vai trò thiết yếu của nguồn lực tâm lý cá nhân trong dự báo một số vấn đề sức khỏe tâm thần cho thanh niên thế hệ Z.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Tài liệu tiếng Việt
1. Phan Như Ngọc, Huỳnh Ngọc Vân Anh, Tô Gia Kiên (2022). Nghiện điện thoại thông minh giảm chất lượng giấc ngủ: nghiên cứu cắt ngang ở học sinh trung học phổ thông tỉnh Bến Tre. Tạp chí Y học TP. Hồ Chí Minh, số 2, 328-335.
2. Nguyễn Minh Tâm, Nguyễn Phúc Thành Nhân, Nguyễn Thị Thuý Hằng (2017). Mối liên quan giữa mức độ sử dụng điện thoại thông minh và các rối loạn giấc ngủ, rối loạn tâm lý ở học sinh trung học phổ thông và sinh viên. Tạp chí Y Dược học, 125. DOI: 10.34071/jmp.2017.4.19.
Tài liệu tiếng Anh
3. Alkal, A. (2025). The role of psychological flexibility and emotion regulation in the relationship between smartphone addiction and psychological wellbeing in adolescents: three-wave longitudinal serial mediation study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 23(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6530346/v1.
4. Bookwala, J., & Fekete, E. (2009). The role of psychological resources in the affective well-being of never-married adults. Journal of social and personal relationships, 26(4), 411–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509339995.
5. Brand, M., Young, K. S., Laier, C., Wölfling, K., & Potenza, M. N. (2016). Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 71, 252-266.
6. Cao, F., Li, X., Xin, S., & Cai, Q. (2024). Impact of social support on the resilience of youth: Mediating effects of coping styles. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, Article 1331813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1331813.
7. Chiesi, F., Vizza, D., Valente, M., Bruno, R., Lau, C., Campagna, M. R., ... & Bruno, F. (2022). Positive personal resources and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: resilience, optimism, hope, courage, trait mindfulness, and self-efficacy in breast cancer patients and survivors. Supportive Care in Cancer, 30(8), 7005-7014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07123-1.
8. Colorado Health Institute. (2025). 2023 CHAS: Gen Z mental health: Today’s young Coloradans are reporting more mental health challenges as they enter adulthood than previous generations. Colorado Health Institute. https://www.coloradohealthinstitute.org/research/2023-chas-gen-z-mental-health.
9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
10. Dezutter, J., Luyckx, K., Wachholtz, A., & Favez, N. (2025). Sense of meaning in life, self-acceptance, and prosocial behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1533687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1533687.
11. Einav, M., & Margalit, M. (2023). Loneliness before and after COVID-19: Sense of Coherence and Hope as Coping Mechanisms. International journal of environmental research and public health, 20(10), 5840. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105840.
12. Gallagher, M. W., Long, L. J., & Phillips, C. A. (2020). Hope, optimism, self-efficacy, and posttraumatic stress disorder: A meta-analytic review of the protective effects of positive expectancies. Journal of clinical psychology, 76(3), 329–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22882.
13. Gallagher, M. W., Long, L. J., Richardson, A., & D’Souza, J. M. (2019). Resilience and coping in cancer survivors: The unique effects of optimism and mastery. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 43(1), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9975-9.
14. Garcia, D., Al Nima, A., & Kjell, O. N. (2014). The affective profiles, psychological well-being, and harmony: environmental mastery and self-acceptance predict the sense of a harmonious life. PeerJ, 2, e259. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.259.
15. Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106(4), 766–794. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.766.
16. Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of general psychology, 6(4), 307-324.
17. Huh, H. J., Kim, K. H., Lee, H. K., Jeong, B. R., Hwang, J. H., & Chae, J. H. (2021). Perceived Stress, Positive Resources and Their Interactions as Possible Related Factors for Depressive Symptoms. Psychiatry investigation, 18(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2020.0208.
18. Hunecke, M. (2022). Psychological resources for sustainable lifestyles. In M. Hunecke (Ed.), Psychology of sustainability: From sustainability marketing to social-ecological transformation (pp. 47–114). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16752-2_3.
19. Huppert, F. A. (2009). Psychological well‐being: Evidence regarding its causes and consequences. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 1(2), 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2009.01008.x.
20. Keyes C. L. (2002). The mental health continuum: from languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of health and social behavior, 43(2), 207–222.
21. Kwon, M., Kim, D. J., Cho, H., & Yang, S. (2013). The Smartphone Addiction Scale: Development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS ONE, 8(12), e83558. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083558.
22. La Guardia, J. G., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.367.
23. Leung, E. (2025, February 4). 2023 CHAS: Gen Z mental health. Colorado Health Institute. https://www.coloradohealthinstitute.org/research/2023-chas-gen-z-mental-health.
24. Li, L., Niu, Z., Mei, S., & Griffiths, M. D. (2021). The relationship between self-control, intolerance of uncertainty, anxiety, and problematic smartphone use among Chinese college students. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 663109. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.663109.
25. Li, R., Fu, W., Liang, Y., Huang, S., Xu, M., & Tu, R. (2024). Exploring the relationship between resilience and internet addiction in Chinese college students: The mediating roles of life satisfaction and loneliness. Acta psychologica, 248, 104405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104405.
26. Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). The general self-efficacy scale: Multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.139.5.439-457.
27. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224.
28. Nguyen-Thi, D. M., Huynh, V. S., & Tran-Chi, V. L. (2020). Loneliness, stress, self-esteem, and deception among adolescents. Journal of Human Ecology, 70(1-3), 118-123.
29. Pearlin, L. I., Lieberman, M. A., Menaghan, E. G., & Mullan, J. T. (1981). The stress process. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22(4), 337–356.
30. Rozgonjuk, D., Sindermann, C., Elhai, J. D., & Montag, C. (2021). Individual differences in Fear of Missing Out (FoMO): Age, gender, and the Big Five personality trait domains, facets, and items. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, Article 110546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110546.
31. Russell, D. W. (1996). UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2.
32. Russell, D., Peplau, L., & Ferguson, M. L. (1978). UCLA Loneliness Scale [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t05974-000.
33. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
34. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(6), 1069.
35. Scholz, U., Doña, B. G., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(3), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.18.3.242.
36. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs, 35(37), 82-003.
37. Seligman, M. E. P. (1991). Learned optimism. New York: Knopf.
38. Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Free Press.
39. Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Bernard, J. (2008). The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back. International journal of behavioral medicine, 15(3), 194-200.
40. Smith, B. W., Tooley, E. M., Christopher, P. J., & Kay, V. S. (2010). Resilience as the ability to bounce back from stress: A neglected personal resource? Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(3), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2010.482186.
41. Snyder, C. R., Rand, K. L., & Sigmon, D. R. (2002). Hope theory: A member of the positive psychology family. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 257–276). Oxford University Press.
42. Snyder, C., Sympson, S., Ybasco, F., & Borders, T. (1996). Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.321.
43. Tamres, L. K., Janicki, D., & Helgeson, V. S. (2002). Sex differences in coping behavior: A meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(1), 2-30. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0601_1.
44. Topp, C. W., Østergaard, S. D., Søndergaard, S., & Bech, P. (2015). The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: A systematic review of the literature. Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, 84(3), 167-176.
45. Tran, M. A. Q., Khoury, B., Chau, N. N. T., Van Pham, M., Dang, A. T. N., Ngo, T. V., ... & Le Dao, A. K. (2024). The role of self-compassion on psychological well-being and life satisfaction of Vietnamese undergraduate students during the COVID-19 pandemic: Hope as a mediator. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 42(1), 35-53.
46. Turner, A. (2015). Generation Z: Technology and Social Interest. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 71(2), 103-113. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jip.2015.0021.
47. UNICEF. (2025, June). Understanding the mental health impact of global challenges on Gen Z. Global Coalition for Youth Mental Well-being. https://www.unicef.org/youthmentalhealthcoalition/understanding-mental-health-impact-global-challenges-gen-z.
48. Wang, X., Wang, S., Yang, D., Chu, Y., Hao, Y., & Dai, H. (2022). Associations among resilience, hope, social support, stress, and anxiety severity in Chinese women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results. Heliyon, 8(12), e12539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12539.
49. WHO. (2004). Promoting mental health: Concepts, emerging evidence, practice (Summary Report). Geneva: World Health Organization. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/42940/9241591595.pdf.
50. Yue, H., Gao, S., Huang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2025). The associations between optimism, personal growth initiative and the latent classes of social media addiction. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1429101. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1429101.
51. Yun, P., Xiaohong, H., Zhongping, Y., & Zhujun, Z. (2021). Family Function, Loneliness, Emotion Regulation, and Hope in Secondary Vocational School Students: A Moderated Mediation Model. Frontiers in public health, 9, 722276. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.722276.


